Sunday, September 13, 2009

National Microwave Ovens Schematics

One Step Ahead exercise in combating abusive of the psychological profession


Section since the last newsletter sent by the Emilia Romagna Psychologists

Dear Colleagues, Dear Colleagues, with this newsletter is pleased to make known to the court decision becomes final passage occurred No 422/2007 by which the Court of Ravenna has condemned Dr. Francesco Abela for improper exercise of the profession of psychologist also recognizes the right to compensation for moral damages and property suffered by the Order, formed in that civil action is a giudizio.Si pronunciation of great interest and great importance as an important success of our category in the fight to illegal. Indeed, it constitutes a new and more serious allegation of unlawful conduct with which those subjects lacking the qualifications required for practice as a psychologist claim, however, to put in-depth evaluations and investigations of alleged purely psychological application of discipline and not atypical rules (which, in this case, that of "naturopathic"). In particular, as also observed by the lawyer. Glue that has assisted and represented the Order in court, the specification of systematic and detailed analysis of events occurring that characterize the motivations of the sentence makes the sentence itself is a great milestone in the evolution of case law on unauthorized practice of the profession of psicologo.In here, while referring to the detailed arguments in the sentence can be downloaded from our website at Fight to illegal / Rulings on cases of unlawful practice of the profession (
here ), the words of the story can be summarized as segue.Il Dr. Abela, after graduating in philosophy, had attended several training courses including, in particular, a master's degree in a course in homeopathy and naturopathy undertaking "intensive professional private pay" for the benefit of persons who, for various reasons, required his advice. However, as correctly stated by Judge also based on evidence arising from the hearing, many had turned to dr. Abela for problems related to their emotional states ("behavioral problems", "kind of emotional distress," "fear of being abandoned," etc.). And these, leaving one to suppose that his qualification to that effect, "diagnose, cure or as advised exerted less activity in the psychological support, performing acts typical of the profession a psychologist. "The Court - fully shares the tips also comments made by CTP Order, Lawyer and Psychologist Dr. Calvi - considered it "clear that the investigation and the approach they tend to be psychological: dialogues on the mood and emotional, childhood, dreams, drawings and testing, interpretation of physical ailments as an expression of a psychological problem; explanations of some inconvenience; suggestions should behave; indication of homeopathic products, or other measures to treat or improve a particular state. It 'just too much to doubt that the accused on several occasions performed standard acts (diagnosis, investigation, support) of their profession protected by the psychologist. "Consequently, the judge convicted the accused of unlawful practice of the profession of psychologist and pursuant to Art. 348 cp remembering, however, that "the state, just in the public interest, must are preparing the necessary means and instruments of control that acts typical of those professions that draw from the physical and mental health of citizens, to be exercised only by persons who have obtained their degree and registration with the association. "In other words, therefore, the Court stated that Dr. Abela had unlawfully taken a typical of the psychological profession, the expression of skills and knowledge that the legislature sought to protect through the identification of a profession is protected in order to avoid any prejudices that might arise from the exercise of certain activities by those he does not have adequate knowledge technical and scientific information, however, stating that "no new figure, in the absence of legislative framework, could in any case to invade the field of professions for which - as stated in art. Cp 348 - requires a special authorization of the State. "Moreover, in ruling that there are more statements are certainly important in the development of confirmations legal principles necessary for a correct application of the criminal case under Article. Cp 348 such as, for example, the configuration of the offense regardless of the correctness of the acts, in addition to the "legitimacy of professional bodies in a civil action against persons who have worked illegally in the profession, causing an injury to the category of property interests and direct image of a lesion. "Forte dei significant results achieved to date, this Order will remain vigilant and act to ensure maximum protection of the profession and membership.

A cordial greeting
Manuela Colombari

Order of Psychologists of Emilia Romagna
www.ordpsicologier.it - \u200b\u200b
e-mail: info@ordpsicologier.it


FORM FOR REPORTING ACTIVITIES OF SUSPECTED 'IRREGULAR COURSE IN PSYCHOLOGICAL




0 comments:

Post a Comment